Rivers
in Dry and Wet Weather
We were interested in understanding just how
clean the rivers of the Pittsburgh Pool are. According to the
experts that advise 3 Rivers 2nd Nature, biological conditions
in these rivers are improving, with fish species increasing by
as much as 400% over the last 20 years. This leaves bacteriological
indicators such as fecal coliform (which indicate the presence
of sewage) and toxics suspended in the mud (the legacy of industry)
as the two areas with little information available. Our interest
was primarily in human use of the rivers in terms of swimming,
boating and fishing. We decided that the bacteriological indicators
would be an area of study with the most immediate benefit.
Dry weather sampling (during periods of no rain) gives us an understanding
of how clean the water is in terms of bacteriological indicators
of agents that can cause gastrointestinal illness. 6
The objective of wet weather sampling is to see to what extent
the level of contamination of the water increases during rainfall,
and how quickly the water quality recovers to dry weather conditions.
Because of the dynamic nature of water quality, and its relationship
to all landforms which drain into the rivers “ wet weather conditions
are significantly different than dry weather conditions. Rain
falling on the urban landscape creates the potential for a range
of pollutants to enter our waterways.
In order to obtain this information, water samples were taken
from transects, or straight lines, across the Monongahela, Allegheny
and Ohio rivers, (See map for details). From each transect, 3
water samples were taken: one 50 feet from each riverbank, and
one from the center of the river. In this way, we could learn
whether water quality is different in the center of the river
than along the edges, where people are more likely to come in
contact with river water.
The main water contaminant tested for was fecal coliform, which
shows whether fecal matter of warm-blooded animals is present
in the water. Fecal coliform does not cause illness by itself,
but it can indicate the presence of other organisms that may cause
gastrointestinal illness. Our tests do not indicate whether the
source of the contamination is human or from other animals, or
even whether it comes from a leaking septic system, a dog run,
raccoon colony, or a sewer overflow. What fecal coliform levels
can tell us is the collective impact that these diverse sources
of bacte-riological pollutants are having on our rivers. Our testing
is the first step in understanding the baseline conditions and
defining a test program which can identify the sources of the
problems.
Streams in Dry Weather
Although there is little information about
water quality in our main rivers, there is even less on the
tributary streams which flow through our neighborhoods, parks
and communities. For every mile of river in the Pittsburgh Pool
there are four miles of streams which feed into those rivers.
Our experts recommended extensive physical chemical analyses
and benthic surveys to tell us more about the aquatic organisms
in our area streams. We also studied the streams for their bacteriological
conditions, to compare them to the main rivers. Because of the
physical difficulty and costs of a wet weather study of streams,
we focused on dry weather conditions.
>Next:
Study Findings
|
Unabridged Water
Quality Report PDF Format
download
Acrobat Reader
|